| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. Streamline PI a bit PLEASE - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
OK, the idea to build the commodities in game is cool, producing them on planets is really cool.Especially since you didnt make it another Elitest/Specialized Industry. On the downside, You made it very tedious and time consuming. I know it isnt...
- by Robert VonBraun - at 2010.06.14 23:41:00
|
2. Can't figure out the new jamming strength. - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Once again CCP swings for the fences with the nerf bat. All you needed to do was lower the base range on the ecm's and add some falloff. or lower the range binus a bit. But you over think simple solutions. Same thing you did with the speed nerf....
- by Robert VonBraun - at 2009.04.23 13:33:00
|
3. Better way to test the probe effects on sisi - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Why dont you add 3 or 4 core probe types on sisi with the only difference to them being the effects they produce. Then after a time period take a poll to see which people prefer then implement that one on tranq. As it stands you tend to improve ...
- by Robert VonBraun - at 2009.04.23 13:19:00
|
4. New Dev Blog: Tech3 and the Updated Effects - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
The problem with t3 prices/availability right now, as i see it, is the overwhelming risk/ not enough reward for the more difficult w-space systems. Right now the sweet spot for w-space are the class 3 frontier sights. It has been a few weeks now s...
- by Robert VonBraun - at 2009.04.23 13:07:00
|
5. Fuel Pellets - streamlining the fuelling experience - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Fuel pellets would be a great idea to add to the game, BUT dont remove current fueling methods. Make the Pellets more expensive than current fueling methods But make them compressed some so that a Tower can run say 25% longer between refuels, ...
- by Robert VonBraun - at 2008.10.27 00:38:00
|
6. CCP Chronotis, this ones for you baby. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
IMHO they should not pay insurance on concord kills and shouldnt pay if ship is lost while criminally flagged, also no payout for self-destructs. One feature that I believe would be cool is if the loss/kill ratio counted toward insurance costs....
- by Robert VonBraun - at 2008.10.27 00:31:00
|
7. [ISSUE] ECM Burst SUCKS - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
1. It works as intended - It Breaks target lock 2. If all the ECM boats bonuses worked with it It would be overpowered 3. If It cost less Cap it would also make it overpowering as well as Lowering the Cycle time on it. If they made the changes ...
- by Robert VonBraun - at 2008.10.10 05:33:00
|
8. NPC Stations needed in 0.0 outside the NPC Regions - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
a bad idea IMHO. It would just become the docking bay for alliance cap fleets and make 0.0 territories impossible to defend. Picture having an enemy fleet always in your space never being able to get rid of them becuaser they can just dock up when...
- by Robert VonBraun - at 2008.09.24 00:09:00
|
9. T3 Idea - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
About a year ago one of the ccp devs mentioned Tech 3 in one of the Blogs dealing with Invention. He stated basically that it would work off of Invention, Somewhere else I read that they wanted T3 ships to be different but not just really expensiv...
- by Robert VonBraun - at 2008.09.23 23:48:00
|
10. Weak POS in > 0.3 - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Wow alot of half correct answers here. in .1 - .7 space you can anchor a tower. in .3 and below space you can anchor reactors, moon harvestors, and lg ship arrays. To anchor a Capital array it has to be in 0.0. .1 - .7 systems require corp facti...
- by Robert VonBraun - at 2008.09.17 10:10:00
|
11. Second Server - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
This post was a waste of your time m8. Your asking ccp to double there server array (already the largest in the gaming industry). All that would be accomplished is doubling the size of the eve universe. I do like the idea of adding more space with...
- by Robert VonBraun - at 2008.09.17 10:02:00
|
12. T2 BPC question - in Science and Industry [original thread]
not all decrytors lower chance of success 2 will raise chance, 2 lower chance and 1 doesnt lower or raise chance. But be careful using decryptors on ships or modules can raise the cost to the point that it will be unprofitable
- by Robert VonBraun - at 2008.09.15 08:41:00
|
13. Manufacturing T1 ammo a huge loss? - in Science and Industry [original thread]
look at the bpo again each production run makes 100 units of ammo so should be around 59 -60 per round of ammo.
- by Robert VonBraun - at 2008.09.15 08:19:00
|
14. WTB 1x60d GTC for 440mil - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
sent
- by Robert VonBraun - at 2008.09.05 15:12:00
|
15. WTB 60 day 440mil - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
sent
- by Robert VonBraun - at 2008.09.05 15:12:00
|
16. WTB 60 day 440mil - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
sending
- by Robert VonBraun - at 2008.09.05 15:11:00
|
17. WTB 1x60d GTC for 440mil - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
sending
- by Robert VonBraun - at 2008.09.05 15:09:00
|
18. [WTB] 60 day gtc @ 440mill - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
sent
- by Robert VonBraun - at 2008.09.05 15:08:00
|
19. [WTB] 60 day gtc @ 440mill - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
sending
- by Robert VonBraun - at 2008.09.05 15:07:00
|
20. WTB 1x60d GTC for 440mil - in Timecode Bazaar [original thread]
char name is incorrect moving on
- by Robert VonBraun - at 2008.09.05 15:07:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |